Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld28 November 20243322889

86-87 Preston Street, BRIGHTON, BN1 2HG

without planning permission the construction/installation of the following alterations to the Property: 1. Tile cladding to the front and side elevations of the building; 2. Tile cladding to the planter situated next to the entrance door; 3. At the front elevation, the erection of raised platform with ramp and steps clad in tile, with glass balustrade with metal handrails, part enclosing the platform; and 4. The installation of external flue to the side elevation of the Property

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Steen A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Regency Square Conservation Area
  • The effect of the development on the setting of nearby listed buildings

What decided it

The prominence of the bright shiny tiles, advertisements, tiled ground, balustrade and industrial-appearance flue harm the significance of heritage assets and this harm is not outweighed by public benefits.

Plan policies cited: CP12, CP15, DM18, DM21, DM26, DM29

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.