Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20243323082

448 Norton Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LR

Planning appeal 3323082 at 448 Norton Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LR (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 28 February 2024 by Inspector Hall R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies.

conversion of existing domestic outbuildings to 3 self- contained dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hall R
Postcode
B94 5LR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • whether the location of the proposal is acceptable with regard to access to facilities and sustainable transport modes
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of No 448 with particular regard to privacy, outlook and access to outside space
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupants of plot 1, with particular regard to privacy, outlook and access to outside space
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with regard to site access
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and the benefits of housing delivery do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm and the harm to existing residents' living conditions, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

The significant weight afforded to the delivery of three additional houses and modest economic benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, the harm to the living conditions of existing occupants of No 448, and the unacceptable location with regard to accessibility, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P17Policy P7Policy P5Policy P14Policy P15Policy P8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 155Paragraph 154Paragraph 109Paragraph 83Paragraph 135Paragraph 115Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

25 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Solihull

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266013961
    The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
  2. Allowed23 October 20266009733
    Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
  3. Allowed12 August 20266010526
    The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
  4. Allowed17 July 20266005246
    Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
  5. Dismissed28 May 20266006096
    The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.