Planning appeal decision
448 Norton Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LR
Planning appeal 3323082 at 448 Norton Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LR (Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 28 February 2024 by Inspector Hall R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies.
conversion of existing domestic outbuildings to 3 self- contained dwellings
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hall R
- Postcode
- B94 5LR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
- whether the location of the proposal is acceptable with regard to access to facilities and sustainable transport modes
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of No 448 with particular regard to privacy, outlook and access to outside space
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupants of plot 1, with particular regard to privacy, outlook and access to outside space
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with regard to site access
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and the benefits of housing delivery do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm and the harm to existing residents' living conditions, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.
The significant weight afforded to the delivery of three additional houses and modest economic benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, the harm to the living conditions of existing occupants of No 448, and the unacceptable location with regard to accessibility, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P17Policy P7Policy P5Policy P14Policy P15Policy P8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 155Paragraph 154Paragraph 109Paragraph 83Paragraph 135Paragraph 115Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Solihull
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 October 20266013961The Stables, Barretts Lane Farm, Barretts Lane, Balsall Common, Coventry, CV7 7GB
- Allowed23 October 20266009733Meadow View, 1A Oldwich Lane West, Chadwick End, B93 0BQ
- Allowed12 August 20266010526The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Meriden, CV7 7JG
- Allowed17 July 20266005246Land West of Stratford Road, Hockley Heath, B94 6NU
- Dismissed28 May 20266006096The Woodlands, Lodge Green Lane, Solihull, CV7 7JG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®