Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 February 20243323170

19a Knighton Lane, Broadmayne, Dorset, DT2 8PH

Planning appeal 3323170 at 19a Knighton Lane, Broadmayne, Dorset, DT2 8PH (Dorset) was dismissed on 7 February 2024 by Inspector Pope N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal accords with development plan policies for the provision of housing and, if not, whether there are any material considerations sufficient to outweigh any conflict.

4 detached bungalows

Authority
Dorset
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pope N
Postcode
DT2 8PH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal accords with development plan policies for the provision of housing and, if not, whether there are any material considerations sufficient to outweigh any conflict
  • The likely effect on Poole Harbour SPA and Ramsar Site arising from any increase in phosphate loads

What decided it

The fallback position of an unrestricted number of caravans on the site, which the previous Inspector found to be a realistic and material consideration of much weight, outweighs the conflict with development plan housing policies for the three-bungalow scheme but does not overcome the character and appearance harm arising from four bungalows.

The benefits of housing delivery and the fallback position outweighed the conflict with development plan policies SUS2 and HOU6 for the three-bungalow scheme (Appeal B), but for the four-bungalow scheme (Appeal A) the harm to character and appearance, when weighed against the limited benefits, tipped the balance against permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SUS2HOU6ENV2ENV10ENV12ENV15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57
Judgments
John Childs v The First Secretary of State and Test Valley Borough Council CO/2689/2005; Brooks and Burton Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1977] 1 WLR 1294; Mansell v Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314; Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another [1980]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dorset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed15 October 20266010988
    Land North Of Castle Avenue, Okeford Fitzpaine, DT11 0RL
  2. Allowed15 July 20266004471
    Muston Down Farm, Birch Lane, Dorchester, DT2 7SU
  3. Allowed27 April 20266004306
    11 Melverley Gardens, Dorset, Wimborne, BH21 1HJ
  4. Allowed18 March 20266000906
    Saxon Maybank East Farm, Bradford Abbas, Dorset, DT9 6JN
  5. Dismissed4 March 20266002355
    Southover Farm, Tolpuddle, Dorset, DT2 7HE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.