Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 November 20233323268

Land West of Thame Road, Chinnor, OX39 4QU

Planning appeal 3323268 at Land West of Thame Road, Chinnor, OX39 4QU (South Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 14 November 2023 by Inspector Rose D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the extent to which the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the countryside, having particular regard to the setting of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; the landscape setting of Chinnor; the visual amenity of people in and around the settlement; and the visual separation of Emmington and Sydenham towards Chinnor.

Outline planning application for up to 150 residential dwellings including up to 40% affordable housing, creation of new vehicular access off of Thame Road and provision of public open space including a children’s play area with associated infrastructure and earthworks. All matters reserved except accessibility to the site, for vehicles in terms of the positioning and treatment of access to the site (as updated by additional information 24 January, 1 March and 6 March 2023)

Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Unknown
Inspector
Rose D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the extent to which the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the countryside, having particular regard to the setting of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; the landscape setting of Chinnor; the visual amenity of people in and around the settlement; and the visual separation of Emmington and Sydenham towards Chinnor
  • the adequacy, or otherwise, of the proposed arrangements for pedestrian accessibility on to Thame Road and connectivity with 'everyday' community facilities and services in the village
  • whether sufficient evidence has been submitted to demonstrate that the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land from within part of the site would be the most sustainable choice from reasonable alternatives on the premise that areas of poorer quality land should be used first in preference to that of a higher quality
  • the extent and consequences of the shortfall in the Council's housing land supply
  • whether, or to what extent, the proposed development complies with the development plan, having particular regard to its spatial strategy and the availability or otherwise of community infrastructure
  • whether or not the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework is engaged; and the determination of the resultant planning balance, in light of all material considerations

What decided it

The significant harm to landscape character and visual amenity, combined with conflict with the development plan and loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the housing and other benefits under the tilted balance.

The adverse impacts of landscape and visual harm, loss of best and most versatile agricultural land and conflict with the development plan significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and other identified benefits, so the tilted balance did not favour granting permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy STRAT1Policy STRAT2Policy H1Policy H4Policy ENV1Policy DES7Policy H9Policy TRANS2Policy TRANS4Policy TRANS5Policy DES1Policy ENV3Policy CH H7Policy CH H6Policy CH H2Policy CH H8Policy CH C1Policy CH R1Policy CH CF1Policy CH GP1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 14Paragraph 57Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 176

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

41 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Oxfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed7 October 20266005521
    Land Rear of The Paddocks, Lower Icknield Way, Chinnor, OX39 4GR
  2. Allowed9 September 20266011224
    The Elms, Woodperry Road, Beckley, OX3 9UZ
  3. Allowed4 September 20266007396
    Emmanuel Ranch, Windmill Road, Towersey, Thame, OX9 3QH
  4. Allowed23 July 20266006870
    Nicholas Hill Cottage, Tilebarn Lane, Henley, RG91RN
  5. Allowed7 July 20266005839
    Land at Watlington Road, Lewknor, OX49 5TS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.