Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 December 20233323658

Birch House Moss Lane, Mere, Knutsford, WA16 0TA

two-storey extension to side

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Russell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative floorspace increase of 57% when including the outbuilding significantly exceeds the 30% threshold in Policy RUR 11, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt with substantial harm that is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 11, 137, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy RUR 11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.