Planning appeal decision
Deal Farm Kenninghall Road, Bressingham, Diss, Norfolk, IP22 2HG
Planning appeal 3324060 at Deal Farm Kenninghall Road, Bressingham, Diss, Norfolk, IP22 2HG (South Norfolk District Council) was dismissed on 6 November 2024 by Inspector Lewis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the function and safety of the surrounding highway network, having regard to the character and standard of the highways providing access to and from the site.
the construction of an Anaerobic Digestion facility (part retrospective), comprising: 1 no. digester tank and 1 no. secondary digester/digestate storage tank, silage clamps; liquid and dry feed system; digestate separation, handling and pasteurization; biogas upgrading and mains gas-grid connection; carbon capture; CHP; agricultural building; office buildings; weighbridge; 2 no. covered digestate storage lagoons; and associated plant, vehicular accesses, roads and landscaping (including earth bunds)
- Authority
- South Norfolk District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Lewis D
- Postcode
- IP22 2HG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposal on the function and safety of the surrounding highway network, having regard to the character and standard of the highways providing access to and from the site
- The effects of the proposal on the landscape character of the area and the appearance of the countryside, considering the scale and design of the proposed plant and buildings, the location and formation of associated infrastructure and proposed mitigation measures
- The effects of the proposal on the amenity of the local community and the occupiers of neighbouring homes
- The contribution of the proposal to sustainable energy generation in the context of national policy on renewable energy and net zero targets
What decided it
The unacceptable and unmitigated impact of increased traffic, particularly heavy commercial vehicles during the harvest period, on the safety of the narrow rural highway network, including the inadequacy of the proposed haul route.
the substantial harm to highway safety was not outweighed by the significant contribution to renewable energy generation, moderate economic benefits, and significant biodiversity net gain, so the overall planning balance weighed against the proposal
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM 3.11Policy DM 4.1Policy DM 4.5Policy CS7Policy DM 1.4Policy DM 4.9Policy DM 3.13Policy DM 4.10Policy 2Policy 3Policy 6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 163Paragraph 194Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 191Paragraph 85Paragraph 88
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Norfolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed14 April 20266004438Land At Downham Grove Industrial Estate, Downham Grove, Wymondham, Norfolk, NR18 0SN
- Dismissed1 October 20253365678Land West of Low Road, Wortwell, Norfolk, IP20 0HJ
- Dismissed15 July 20253315238Furze Green Meadow, Harleston Road, Rushall , Norfolk , IP21 4RT
- Notice varied and upheld8 July 20253297156The Old Vineyard, Overwood Lane, Great Moulton, Norfolk, NR16 1LW
- Allowed3 July 20253353472Land at The Loke, Costessey , Norfolk, NR5 0TD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®