Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed1 May 20243324441

Highbury Pool, Highbury Crescent , London, N5 1RR

Planning appeal 3324441 at Highbury Pool, Highbury Crescent , London, N5 1RR (London Borough of Islington) was allowed on 1 May 2024 by Inspector Rafiq F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the disputed condition is reasonable or necessary in the interests of the character and appearance of the appeal building, whether it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Highbury Fields Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of nearby listed buildings on Highbury Place.

Section 73 (Minor Material Amendment) application to vary condition 2 (Drawing and document numbers) of planning permission ref P2015/0386/FUL for a single storey extension with pitched roof, flat roof draught lobby box to the front, and double height extension sitting above the existing gym, spa and plant areas on Eastern side elevation

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Rafiq F
Postcode
N5 1RR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed condition is reasonable or necessary in the interests of the character and appearance of the appeal building, whether it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Highbury Fields Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of nearby listed buildings on Highbury Place

What decided it

The cowls, although visible, are appropriately sited and finished such that they do not harm the character and appearance of the appeal building, the Highbury Fields Conservation Area, or the setting of nearby listed buildings, making the condition unreasonable and unnecessary.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
PLAN1DH2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 195Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 852 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed22 October 20266006605
    131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
  2. Allowed16 October 20266005930
    30 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266005904
    Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
  4. Dismissed24 September 20266005590
    2 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
  5. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.