Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 February 20243324872

18 Well Row, Bayford, HERTFORD, SG13 8PW

erection of 2No outbuildings to provide a gym and office. Demolition of existing garage

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Down K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed outbuildings would amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposed outbuildings on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed air conditioning units on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with respect to noise
  • If the proposed outbuildings would amount to inappropriate development, whether the harm, by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, such as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The realistic fallback position of the Lawful Development Certificate for pitched roof outbuildings located more prominently in the garden, which would have a greater effect on openness than the appeal scheme, carried considerable weight and clearly outweighed the harm identified, establishing very special circumstances.

Framework references: 154

Plan policies cited: Policy GBR1, Policy DES4, Policy EQ2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.