Planning appeal decision
10A Dale Hill, Blackwell, Bromsgrove, B60 1QJ
Planning appeal 3324998 at 10A Dale Hill, Blackwell, Bromsgrove, B60 1QJ (Bromsgrove District Council) was dismissed on 3 June 2024 by Inspector Radcliffe I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy.
Two detached bungalows
- Authority
- Bromsgrove District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Radcliffe I
- Postcode
- B60 1QJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the accessibility of services and facilities from the appeal site by sustainable modes of transport
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- whether future occupiers would experience acceptable outdoor living conditions in terms of noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of nearby residents, with regard to overlooking and outlook
- whether the proposed development would be safe for future occupiers with respect to its proximity to a gas pipeline
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial weight given to the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with material harm to character and appearance, highway safety, future occupier living conditions, and accessibility, clearly outweighed the limited material considerations in favour of the proposal, including the contribution to housing supply.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt and other identified harms (character and appearance, highway safety, living conditions of future occupiers, accessibility) substantially outweighed the material considerations in favour, including the contribution of two dwellings to the housing shortfall.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BDP4Policy BDP19Policy BDP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 152Paragraph 114Paragraph 135Paragraph 153Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bromsgrove District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266013818Stewards Place, Kidderminster Road, Woodcote Green, Dodford, Bromsgrove, B61 9DZ
- Dismissed26 October 20266010850The Bungalow, Hartle Lane, Bromsgrove, DY9 9UL
- Allowed10 September 20266011301Land at Doctors Hill, Bournheath, Bromsgrove, B61 9JE
- Allowed17 August 20266010859Giles House Farm, Bromsgrove Road, Stoubridge, DY9 9TY
- Dismissed7 August 20266008391Five Spice Restuarant, Stourbridge Road, Belbroughton, DY9 9TX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®