Planning appeal decision
52 Green Lane, Ilford, IG1 1YJ
Planning appeal 3325241 at 52 Green Lane, Ilford, IG1 1YJ (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 9 February 2024 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of No 50 Green Lane with particular regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook.
conversion and single storey extension of ground floor to create 2 flats at 52 Green Lane, Ilford, London, IG1 1YJ
- Authority
- London Borough of Redbridge
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Williams K
- Postcode
- IG1 1YJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of No 50 Green Lane with particular regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook
What decided it
The significant harm to the outlook and sense of enclosure experienced by the occupiers of No 50 Green Lane from the proposed extension, which would not be outweighed by the modest housing delivery benefits in the planning balance.
The modest social and economic benefits of delivering one additional one-bedroom home were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in respect of outlook, such that the tilted balance did not favour the grant of permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP30Policy LP26
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135
- Judgments
- Wheatcroft (Bernard) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1982) JLP 37; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
- Allowed25 September 20266013032289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
- Dismissed25 September 202633619992A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
- Allowed25 September 2026336022938, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
- Notice varied and upheld23 September 2026336944412 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®