Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 January 20243325351

Mirrlees Fields, Stockport, SK2 7DR

Planning appeal 3325351 at Mirrlees Fields, Stockport, SK2 7DR (Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 24 January 2024 by Inspector Mulloy C, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the supply of open space.

outline planning application with all matters reserved proposing the erection of a residential development for up to 200 dwellings, with associated landscaping, site infrastructure and the provision of new public open space

Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Unknown
Inspector
Mulloy C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the supply of open space

What decided it

The realistic prospect of a materially worse fallback position (an impermeable boundary fence under permitted development rights) combined with the significant housing and affordable housing shortfall meant the benefits of the scheme outweighed the identified conflict with the development plan's open space policies.

The significant social, economic and environmental benefits of the proposal, together with the fallback position, outweighed the conflict with the development plan (Policies UOS1.2 and CS8) such that adverse impacts of granting permission did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development applied.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy UOS1.2Policy NE3.1Policy CS8Policy CS3Policy H-3Policy CS2Policy CS4Policy H-2Policy CS10Policy L1.7Policy L1.8Policy SIE-2Policy CS1Policy AED-5Policy SD-6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 6Paragraph 11Paragraph 85Paragraph 99Paragraph 103Paragraph 130Paragraph 131Paragraph 180Paragraph 185Paragraph 186Paragraph 225
Judgments
Renew Land Developments v Welsh Ministers [2020] EWCA Civ 143; R(Brommell) v Reading BC & Anr [2018] EWHC 3529 (Admin); St Modwen Development Limited v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others [2017] EWCA Civ 1643

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

40 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266008381
    15 St Matthews Road, Edgeley, Stockport, SK3 9EZ
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266011394
    11 Hyde Road, Stockport, SK6 1QG
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266010632
    315-317 London Road, Hazel Grove, Stockport, SK7 4PS
  4. Dismissed16 July 20266008255
    45 Finney Lane, Heald Green, Cheadle, SK8 3DY
  5. Dismissed16 July 20266008254
    2 Arden Close, Heald Green, Cheadle, SK8 3NF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.