Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 January 20243325792

5 Senacre Lane, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 8HB

demolition of existing garage, construction of new three- bedroom dwelling

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Naylor R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposal's incongruous roof form and design, which would be discordant with and fail to respond positively to the distinctive character and proportions of the existing dwellings in Sutton Heights, constituted substantial harm that outweighed the modest benefits of the development.

The substantial harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest social and economic benefits of the proposed development

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy DM9, Policy DM11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.