Planning appeal decision
5 Senacre Lane, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 8HB
demolition of existing garage, construction of new three- bedroom dwelling
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Naylor R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
What decided it
The proposal's incongruous roof form and design, which would be discordant with and fail to respond positively to the distinctive character and proportions of the existing dwellings in Sutton Heights, constituted substantial harm that outweighed the modest benefits of the development.
The substantial harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest social and economic benefits of the proposed development
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy DM9, Policy DM11
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®