Planning appeal decision
Archway Campus, 2-10 Highgate Hill, London, N19 5LP
Planning appeal 3326166 at Archway Campus, 2-10 Highgate Hill, London, N19 5LP (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 9 May 2024 by Inspector Wiltshire M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether there is a need for the proposed meanwhile use having regard to its scale and any specific need for artists' studios/exhibition space identified by the Council in accordance with Policy HC5 of the London Plan and Local Plan Policy R9.
full application for temporary use of existing buildings for non-residential artists’ studios and exhibition space (Sui Generis)
- Authority
- London Borough of Islington
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- community-institutional · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Wiltshire M
- Postcode
- N19 5LP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether there is a need for the proposed meanwhile use having regard to its scale and any specific need for artists' studios/exhibition space identified by the Council in accordance with Policy HC5 of the London Plan and Local Plan Policy R9.
- Whether the proposed meanwhile use, by reason of: (i) the period of use proposed; (ii) its proposed scale, (iii) extent of occupation across the site, and (iv) its timeframe for roll out, would impede the policy priority for the residential led redevelopment of the site and the urgent delivery of conventional housing, contrary to: (i) Site Allocation ARCH5 (2023); (ii) the urgent imperative to deliver conventional housing on the site reflected in the housing targets in Local Plan Policy H1; and (iii) Local Plan Policy R9.
- Whether the CIL contributions from the residential development are a necessary material consideration under s.70(2)(b) and, if so, whether the proposed meanwhile use, which is expressly pending long term residential development of the site, would result in a substantial reduction of the projected CIL contributions that residential development would generate resulting in a loss of necessary enhancements to services and the environment contrary to Local Plan Policy ST1.
- Whether the proposal fails to provide sufficient detail to demonstrate that the operation of the proposed meanwhile use would achieve the highest standards of fire safety and ensure the safety of all building users, contrary to Policies D5 and D12 of the London Plan.
What decided it
The combined substantial harms of delay to housing delivery/conflict with the development plan and insufficient fire safety detail were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of the meanwhile use.
The harms of delay to housing delivery and development plan conflict, fire safety deficiencies, and reduced CIL contributions (carrying substantial weight overall) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of the meanwhile artists' studios use, so the balance tipped against permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HC5Policy R9Policy H1Site Allocation ARCH5Policy ST1Policy D12Policy D5
- Judgments
- Newbury v SSE; R(Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd [2019] UKSC 53; Mount Cook Land case
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Islington
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed22 October 20266006605131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
- Allowed16 October 2026600593030 Sekforde Street, London, EC1R 0HH
- Allowed24 September 20266005904Upper Flat, 23 Ronalds Road, London, N5 1XF
- Dismissed24 September 202660055902 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
- Notice upheld23 September 20263364241First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®