Planning appeal decision
Area of Footpath, Woodbury Road Street Works, Woodbury Road, Basingstoke , RG22 4XU
Planning appeal 3326248 at Area of Footpath, Woodbury Road Street Works, Woodbury Road, Basingstoke , RG22 4XU (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 16 April 2024 by Inspector Simpson V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and on highway safety, with particular regard to pedestrian movements along a pathway and road crossing, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives.
Proposed 5G telecoms installation: H3G 15m phase 9 street pole and additional equipment cabinets
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Simpson V
- Postcode
- RG22 4XU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and on highway safety, with particular regard to pedestrian movements along a pathway and road crossing, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The harm to character and appearance caused by the visually prominent and incongruous street pole in an otherwise open and spacious pathway, combined with the failure to adequately demonstrate that no less harmful alternatives exist, outweighed the accepted need for the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- EM1EM10CN9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 119Paragraph 121
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed12 April 20243322941Area of Footpath, Buckingham Parade, Kempshott, Basingstoke Hampshire, RG22 5NY
- Dismissed17 October 20233317775Oakridge Road, Basingstoke, RG21 5QH
- Dismissed16 December 20223299004Tile Barn Row, East Woodhay, Woolton Hill, RG20 9UU
- Dismissed28 November 20223300598South of Pack Farm Off St Johns Road, East Oakley, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG23 7JW
- Dismissed24 November 20223295050Warwick Road, Basingstoke, RG23 8DS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®