Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 March 20243326338

22 Firs Lane, LONDON, N21 3ES

the subdivision of the site and erection of one residential unit involving an extension to the existing dwelling at 22 Firs Lane and alterations to the existing hip roof

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Robbie K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the appeal property and its surroundings

What decided it

The substantial and incongruous nature of the proposed extensions in a prominent location would cause disproportionate harm to the character and appearance of the appeal property and the distinctive row of houses, which could not be justified by the limited housing and economic benefits.

Plan policies cited: Policy CP30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025, Policy DMD6 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD7 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD14 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD37 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.