Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 April 20243326393

Land west of Ash Road, Hartley , Sevenoaks, Kent , DA3 8HA

the erection of 4 detached self-build/custom build houses with amenity land, car parking and ancillary works

Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with harm to character and appearance, is not clearly outweighed by the modest housing supply benefit and limited self-build provision.

The modest contribution of four dwellings to housing supply and limited benefit of self-build/custom build provision do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, loss of openness, and harm to character and appearance; the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) does not apply because Green Belt policies provide a clear reason for refusal.

Framework references: 11, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy LO1, Policy LO8, Policy EN1, Policy EN5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.