Planning appeal decision
Land at Randalls Farm, Whitesmith, Chiddingly, East Sussex, BN8 6JB
Planning appeal 3326457 at Land at Randalls Farm, Whitesmith, Chiddingly, East Sussex, BN8 6JB (Wealden District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 3 February 2025 by Inspector King T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the Council has a five year land supply for gypsy and traveller purposes, current need, and the availability of alternative accommodation.
‘Part retrospective application for the change of use of land for the stationing of 5 no. static and 4 no. touring caravans associated with 4 no. gypsy and traveller pitches (4 no. pitches in total) including hardstanding, fencing and package treatment plant.’ Formal
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- King T
- Postcode
- BN8 6JB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the Council has a five year land supply for gypsy and traveller purposes, current need, and the availability of alternative accommodation
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether the location of the development is acceptable having regard to the Council's spatial policy
- the effect of the development, with the use of the existing access, on highway safety, and whether the proposed new access would be satisfactory in this respect
- the proposal's effects on surface water drainage
What decided it
The unmet need for gypsy and traveller provision, combined with the ability to secure a satisfactory new access and mitigate other harms through conditions, was decisive in allowing Appeal B, while the unresolved substandard existing access was decisive in dismissing Appeal A.
The significant/substantial weight given to the unmet need for gypsy and traveller pitches, together with the prospect of mitigating harm to character, drainage and highway safety through conditions (including a new access and Site Development Scheme), outweighed the identified conflicts with spatial and drainage policy, leading to permission being granted in Appeal B, whereas in Appeal A the unresolved harm from the existing access meant the enforcement notice was upheld.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- WCS 10EN27WCS14WCS11WCS11(2)EN1
- Judgments
- Lisa Smith judgement
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice varied and upheld28 September 20263356589Land An New House Farm, Buckham Hill, Isfield, East Sussex, TN22 5XU
- Allowed15 September 20266008314Land off Eastbourne Road, Polegate, BN26 5DD
- Quashed15 September 20266006632Land at Five Oaks, Lewes Road, Laughton, BN8 6BJ
- decided15 September 20266006631Land at Five Oaks, Lewes Road, Laughton, BN8 6BJ
- Dismissed17 July 20266007376Land Adjoining 154 Station Road, Hailsham, BN27 2SB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®