Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20243326592

The Creamery , Trevarrian, Newquay , TR8 4AH

redevelopment of site for mixed use scheme

Authority
Cornwall Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Harrington S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for business space, having regard to supporting economic growth and the requirements of the development plan
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal secures adequate provision for any additional need for education, public open space and health provision arising from the development, and mitigation measures relating to the Penhale Dunes Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The failure to adequately demonstrate that the proposal would make adequate provision for business space having regard to supporting economic growth and the requirements of LP Policy 5, which was given significant weight and outweighed the moderate benefits of housing provision and other benefits.

The significant weight given to the conflict with LP Policy 5 on business space provision outweighed the moderate weight afforded to housing supply on previously developed land and the limited benefits of public open space, biodiversity net gain, commercial uses and construction industry support, resulting in dismissal.

Plan policies cited: LP Policy 5, LP Policy 2, LP Policy 12, LP Policy 21, LP Policy 23, saved Policy 14 of the Restormel Borough Local Plan (RBLP), LP Policy 28, LP Policy 22, LP Policy 8, LP Policy 27

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.