Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 August 20243326771

10A NAPIER ROAD, LONDON, E11 3JR

construction of infill extension and roof alteration to the existing industrial / storage buildings in connection to change of use to mix use and subdivision into office units and industrial / storage (Class B2/B8 and E(g)(i)), with associated bicycle storage, soft and hard landscaping

Authority
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would accord with local policies with regard to location
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to parking, servicing and construction logistics
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of neighbouring dwellings with particular regard to outlook, daylight and sunlight, privacy and noise/disturbance
  • whether the proposal would accord with local policies with regards to highway infrastructure and climate change

What decided it

The considerable adverse effects on character and appearance, location policy compliance, highway safety, and neighbouring living conditions were not outweighed by the modest benefits of brownfield redevelopment and employment generation.

Framework references: 135, 91, 114, 124, 55, 57

Plan policies cited: Policy 53, Policy 28, Policy 39, Policy 65, Policy 60, Policy 61, Policy 64, Policy 66, Policy 57, Policy 63, London Plan Policy T4, London Plan Policy T7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.