Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 April 20243327093

Land Adjacent Greenfields, Bartholomew Green, Great Leighs, Chelmsford, CM3 1QG

Planning appeal 3327093 at Land Adjacent Greenfields, Bartholomew Green, Great Leighs, Chelmsford, CM3 1QG (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 12 April 2024 by Inspector Carpenter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location with respect to existing settlements, services and facilities.

erection of a detached dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Carpenter C
Postcode
CM3 1QG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location with respect to existing settlements, services and facilities

What decided it

The proposed development would not be in a suitable location with respect to existing settlements, services and facilities, conflicting with the development plan and the Framework's sustainability principles, and the limited housing benefit does not outweigh this conflict given the up-to-date neighbourhood plan policies.

The limited benefits of the proposal (small contribution to housing supply and modest local economic benefit) were substantially outweighed by the adverse impact of allowing development that conflicts with the up-to-date Felsted Neighbourhood Plan policies, to which substantial weight was attributed under paragraph 14 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ULP Policy S7FNP Policies FEL/HN5FNP Policies FEL/HN6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 48Paragraph 84Paragraph 11Paragraph 68Paragraph 14

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Uttlesford District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed26 October 20266010267
    6 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266011359
    Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266009731
    Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
  4. Allowed6 October 20266006335
    Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
  5. Dismissed1 October 20266010951
    Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.