Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 March 20243327285

77 Bexton Road, KNUTSFORD, WA16 0DY

extension to, and recladding of, existing garage

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Senior H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify it, as the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and other harms are not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 142, 143, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy RUR11, Policy SD1, Policy SD2, Policy SD3, Policy GEN1, Policy HOU11, Policy PG3, Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy D3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.