Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 February 20243327463

432-434 Bitterne Road Precinct, Bitterne Village, SOUTHAMPTON, SO18 5RT

PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT REAR OF 432- 434 TO FORM 6 x One Bed RESIDENTIAL and 1 x Two Bed RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING

Authority
Southampton City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gethin T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on preserved trees, with particular regard to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, biodiversity and climate change mitigation
  • whether the wider impacts of the proposed development would be sufficiently mitigated

What decided it

The inevitable future pressure to prune or remove the preserved trees due to overshadowing and safety concerns would result in significant harm to character, appearance, biodiversity and climate change mitigation that outweighs the limited housing benefits even under the tilted balance.

The significant harm to character, appearance, biodiversity and climate change mitigation from pressure to prune or remove the preserved trees, combined with insufficient mitigation of wider impacts, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery and sustainable location, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy SDP 1, Policy SDP 4, Policy CS 13, Policy CS 18, Policy CS 22, Policy CS 25

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.