Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 August 20243327488

Unit 3, 79 Pretoria Road, Edmonton, North London, N18 1SP

Planning appeal 3327488 at Unit 3, 79 Pretoria Road, Edmonton, North London, N18 1SP (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 1 August 2024 by Inspector Reid L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed change of use and the effect on the Locally Significant Industrial Site (LSIS).

change of use from social club to a House in Multiple Occupation (Use Class C4) for five individuals

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Reid L
Postcode
N18 1SP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed change of use and the effect on the Locally Significant Industrial Site (LSIS)
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to amenity space provision, noise and disturbance and the size of the bedrooms
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would compromise the function of the Locally Significant Industrial Site and provide unsatisfactory living conditions for future occupiers in an inappropriate location for residential use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 15Core Policy 4Core Policy 30Core Policy 32Core Policy 24Core Policy 25Policy DMD 20Policy DMD 8Policy DMD 9Policy DMD 37Policy DMD 68Policy DMD 45Policy DMD 47Policy DMD 48Policy E2Policy E4Policy E6Policy D6Policy D14Policy T2Policy T3Policy T4Policy T5Policy T6Policy T7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 193

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

386 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006826
    28 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
  5. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.