Planning appeal decision
Stockleaze, Earthcott Green, Alveston, Bristol, BS35 3TF
Planning appeal 3328020 at Stockleaze, Earthcott Green, Alveston, Bristol, BS35 3TF (South Gloucestershire Council) was allowed on 26 January 2024 by Inspector Rafiq F, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the development plan and the Framework.
the erection of 1 no. log cabin to form temporary rural workers dwelling for a period of 3 years and erection of a building to form pigeon loft
- Authority
- South Gloucestershire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rafiq F
- Postcode
- BS35 3TF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the development plan and the Framework
- the effect of the proposed log cabin on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether there is an essential need for a rural worker to live at the site
- whether the appeal site is in a suitable location for residential accommodation, having regard to access to services and facilities
- the effect of the log cabin on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The demonstrated essential need for a rural worker to live at the site in connection with a viable pigeon breeding and racing enterprise amounted, together with other considerations, to the very special circumstances necessary to outweigh the Green Belt harm.
The harm to the Green Belt from inappropriateness and loss of openness was clearly outweighed by other considerations, principally the essential need case for the rural worker's dwelling, such that very special circumstances existed justifying the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PSP7Policy CS5Policy PSP40Policy PSP41Policy CS4APolicy CS8Policy PSP11Policy CS1Policy CS34Policy PSP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 142Paragraph 84Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed13 October 20266010963Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
- Dismissed13 October 20266009931Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY
- Planning permission granted4 September 20263378284Land Adjacent to Orchard Farm Cottage, Pomphrey Hill, Mangotsfield, Bristol, BS16 9NF
- Planning permission granted17 August 20263378286Land At Northwick Road, Pilning, Bristol, BS35 4LX
- Dismissed13 July 20266006492Long Acre Farm, Dodington Lane, Dodington, BS37 6SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®