Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 July 20243328115

Land North of Walson Way,, Stansted, Essex, CM24 8EU

Planning appeal 3328115 at Land North of Walson Way,, Stansted, Essex, CM24 8EU (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 25 July 2024 by Inspector Bowden N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupants having regard to the size of outdoor private amenity space.

the erection of 8 no. 3-bed semi-detached dwellings together with parking and amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowden N
Postcode
CM24 8EU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupants having regard to the size of outdoor private amenity space
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The substandard size of private outdoor amenity space would fail to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants, and this harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery.

the adverse impacts on the living conditions of the future occupants significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GEN2Policy S1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

69 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Uttlesford District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed26 October 20266010267
    6 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266011359
    Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266009731
    Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
  4. Allowed6 October 20266006335
    Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
  5. Dismissed1 October 20266010951
    Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.