Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 June 20243328173

Footpath Outside Sainsburys Petrol Station, Foortscray Road, Eltham, London, SE9 2TZ

Planning appeal 3328173 at Footpath Outside Sainsburys Petrol Station, Foortscray Road, Eltham, London, SE9 2TZ (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 26 June 2024 by Inspector Robinson N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.

5G telecoms installation: H3G 15m street pole and additional equipment cabinets

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Robinson N
Postcode
SE9 5DP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The proposed mast would result in unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area by virtue of its size and dominance in views, and the appellant had not provided sufficiently rigorous evidence that no realistic alternative locations existed where the installation would be less visually harmful.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D8Policy DH1Policy DH(c)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

335 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed30 September 20266007470
    44 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
  2. Dismissed14 July 20263375007
    Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ
  3. Unknown14 July 20263374853
    Outside No. 37 Shaba Hair & Cosmetics, Powis Street, London, SE18 6HZ
  4. Dismissed6 July 20263376767
    2-4 Court Yard, Eltham, SE9 5PZ
  5. Allowed19 June 20266000585
    278, Halfway Street, Sidcup, Greenwich, DA15 8DT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.