Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 May 20243328174

Land adjacent to 2 Gaynesford Road, Forest Hill, London, SE23 2UQ

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to outlook for the occupiers of 49 and 51 Church Rise
  • the effect of the proposal on the character or appearance of the area, with due regard to the location of the site in the Perry Vale and the Christmas Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The failure to provide a high standard of amenity for both future occupiers and neighbouring residents, particularly regarding daylight, sunlight and outlook, carried substantial negative weight that outweighed the benefits of housing supply and efficient land use.

Framework references: 135, 60

Plan policies cited: Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy 15 of the Core Strategy: Development Plan Document (2011), Policy 32 of the Development Management Local Plan (2014), Policy 1 of the Core Strategy, Policies D4 and HC1 of the London Plan, Policies DM33 and DM36(B) of the Development Management Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.