Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 April 20243328191

4 Golf Ride , Enfield, EN2 9DA

described in the application form as follows: “single- storey rear infill extension, converting a garage into a habitable room, erection of two side dormers, including the alternation of the roof to form a Loft conversion and alterations to the front façade

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Shrimplin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings

What decided it

The proposed side dormers would cause unacceptable harm to the visual amenities of the street scene and surrounding area, conflicting with national and local planning policies on design quality and character.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D4, London Plan Policy D8, Enfield Plan Core Strategy Policy 30, Improving Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD8, Improving Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD13, Improving Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD14, Improving Enfield Development Management Document Policy DMD37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.