Planning appeal decision
1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
Planning appeal 3328199 at 1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 17 May 2024 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
conversion of outbuilding to studio dwelling, and associated works
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Wallace J
- Postcode
- N13 4SA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether there would be acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling
What decided it
The significant harm to character and appearance and the failure to provide acceptable living conditions, particularly the enclosed outlook, outweigh the limited benefits of delivering a single dwelling in an area with good access to services.
The limited benefits of delivering an additional dwelling and associated economic benefits are significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and failure to provide acceptable living conditions, such that the proposal does not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Enfield Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP4Enfield Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD6Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD7Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD8Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD9Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD13Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD37London Plan (2021) Policy D3London Plan (2021) Policy D4London Plan (2021) Policy D5London Plan (2021) Policy D6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 131Paragraph 135
- Judgments
- Maximus Networks Ltd v SSHCLG & Others [2018] EWHC 1933 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed27 October 2026601285577 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Dismissed29 September 2026601020761 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
- Dismissed28 September 2026601259821 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®