Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 May 20243328199

1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA

Planning appeal 3328199 at 1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 17 May 2024 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

conversion of outbuilding to studio dwelling, and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Wallace J
Postcode
N13 4SA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether there would be acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance and the failure to provide acceptable living conditions, particularly the enclosed outlook, outweigh the limited benefits of delivering a single dwelling in an area with good access to services.

The limited benefits of delivering an additional dwelling and associated economic benefits are significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and failure to provide acceptable living conditions, such that the proposal does not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Enfield Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP4Enfield Core Strategy (2010) Policy CP30Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD6Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD7Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD8Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD9Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD13Enfield Development Management Document (2014) Policy DMD37London Plan (2021) Policy D3London Plan (2021) Policy D4London Plan (2021) Policy D5London Plan (2021) Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 131Paragraph 135
Judgments
Maximus Networks Ltd v SSHCLG & Others [2018] EWHC 1933 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

519 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.