Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed1 May 20243328680

66 Northfield Avenue, West Ealing, W13 9RR

Planning appeal 3328680 at 66 Northfield Avenue, West Ealing, W13 9RR (London Borough of Ealing) was allowed on 1 May 2024 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

part change of use from dry cleaners (class E) to residential (C3); two storey rear extension, dormer formation; conversion to provide 4 residential units

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
James A
Postcode
W13 9RR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants of 68 Northfield Avenue, having particular regard to enclosure
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants of Unit 1, with regard to daylight and sunlight
  • whether the reduction in size of the commercial floor space would affect the operation and viability of this unit

What decided it

The proposal accords with development plan policies and the Framework on all four main issues, with the extension being well-designed, neighbouring amenity protected, future resident amenity acceptable, and commercial viability maintained.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 7.4Policy 7BPolicy 1.1Policy 1.2Policy D3Policy D4Policy 3.5Policy 7DPolicy D6Policy 4APolicy E2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

337 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266014340
    21 Northcote Avenue, Southall, UB1 2AX
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266012839
    Station Parade, Advertising Right Adj 1 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 3LD
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  5. Dismissed12 October 20266012335
    Land Rear of 4 Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 9AT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.