Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 April 20243328795

36 Upper Street, Islington, LONDON, N1 0PN

the retention and reduction in size of first floor rear extension and change of use of upper floors from retail and ancillary storage space (Use Class E(a)) to a small house of multiple occupation (HMO) with 6 bedrooms for 6 people (Use Class C4)

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Rafiq F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the loss of business floor space has been adequately justified
  • whether the development would provide satisfactory accommodation for its future occupants with regard to outlook

What decided it

The proposal failed to justify the loss of business floorspace through adequate marketing evidence and would not provide satisfactory accommodation due to poor outlook from one bedroom.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy B3, Policy SP4, Policy R1, Policy R2, Policy R3, Policy H1, Policy H4, Policy H10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.