Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 May 20243328842

Land Rear Of Francis Court, Cumberland Road, Cliftonville, Margate, CT9 2JZ

Planning appeal 3328842 at Land Rear Of Francis Court, Cumberland Road, Cliftonville, Margate, CT9 2JZ (Thanet District Council) was dismissed on 14 May 2024 by Inspector Price A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

the demolition of existing double garage and erection of new two storey two bedroom house

Authority
Thanet District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Price A
Postcode
CT9 2JZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the extent to which the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Norfolk Road, Warwick Road, Surrey Road Conservation Area
  • whether the proposed development would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation, with particular regard to internal space standards and amenity space
  • whether adequate refuse storage would be provided

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area, combined with the failure to meet internal space standards, could not be justified by the limited public benefits of providing one additional dwelling.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy QD02Policy QD01Policy SP29Policy HE02Policy GI04Policy QD04Policy QD03
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 207Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

78 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Thanet

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266009743
    75 Ramsgate Road, Margate, CT9 5SA
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009253
    Land Adjacent Eastchurch Road And, Ashurst Gardens, Margate, CT9 3HY
  3. Allowed21 October 20266013089
    4 Convent Road, Broadstairs, CT10 3BE
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266008000
    166 Percy Avenue, Kingsgate, Broadstairs, CT10 3LF
  5. Allowed3 September 20266008943
    7 The Ridgeway, Broadstairs, CT10 2HB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.