Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 August 20243329104

Land Between 46-52 Cliffe Road, Strood, Rochester, ME2 3DR

Planning appeal 3329104 at Land Between 46-52 Cliffe Road, Strood, Rochester, ME2 3DR (Medway Council) was dismissed on 14 August 2024 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the amount and layout of private amenity space.

‘construction of semi detached properties consisting of 4 residential units with associated parking’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J
Postcode
ME2 3DR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the amount and layout of private amenity space
  • the effect on biodiversity

What decided it

The poor quality and lack of privacy of the private amenity space proposed for future occupiers, which would provide an enduring harm to living conditions that outweighed the modest benefits of the four dwellings.

The significant harm to living conditions from inadequate and poor-quality private amenity space outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BNE1Policy BNE2Policy H4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 180

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

56 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Medway

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266014100
    130 High Street, Gillingham, ME7 1AS
  2. Dismissed9 October 20266009269
    Land Between Cumberland Road and Medway Road, Gillingham, ME7 1NH
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266009769
    Street Record, Callis Way, Parkwood, Gillingham, ME8 9PA
  4. Dismissed21 September 20266004691
    Land South of Woodview House, Perry Hill, Cliffe Woods, ME3 7TX
  5. Dismissed6 August 20266007660
    180-182 Luton Road, Chatham, ME4 5BP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.