Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 July 20243329603

33- 52 Bridle Close, Enfield, EN3 6EA

upward extension of existing detached block of flats from its current overall height of 11.108m to an overall height of 16.424m with new window positions to replicate the existing and all external materials to match the existing

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Reid L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the transport and highways impacts of the development concerning parking, highway safety, cycle storage and waste facilities
  • the size of the proposed flats and the compliance with the Nationally Described Space Standards (the NDSS)
  • the impact on the amenity of the neighbouring premises including outlook and the loss of light

What decided it

The proposal failed to meet the mandatory conditions set out in Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the GPDO, specifically in relation to transport and highway impacts and compliance with the Nationally Described Space Standards.

Plan policies cited: Policy T2 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T5 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T6.1 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T7 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T3 of the London Plan 2021, Core Policy 25 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010, Policy DMD 45 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD 47 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD 48 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021, Core Policy 30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010, Policy DMD 8 of the Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD 37 of the Development Management Document 2014

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.