®Planning appeal decision
33- 52 Bridle Close, Enfield, EN3 6EA
Planning appeal 3329603 at 33- 52 Bridle Close, Enfield, EN3 6EA (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 26 July 2024 by Inspector Reid L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the transport and highways impacts of the development concerning parking, highway safety, cycle storage and waste facilities.
upward extension of existing detached block of flats from its current overall height of 11.108m to an overall height of 16.424m with new window positions to replicate the existing and all external materials to match the existing
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Reid L
- Postcode
- EN3 6EA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the transport and highways impacts of the development concerning parking, highway safety, cycle storage and waste facilities
- the size of the proposed flats and the compliance with the Nationally Described Space Standards (the NDSS)
- the impact on the amenity of the neighbouring premises including outlook and the loss of light
What decided it
The proposal failed to meet the mandatory conditions set out in Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the GPDO, specifically in relation to transport and highway impacts and compliance with the Nationally Described Space Standards.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy T2 of the London Plan 2021Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021Policy T5 of the London Plan 2021Policy T6.1 of the London Plan 2021Policy T7 of the London Plan 2021Policy T3 of the London Plan 2021Core Policy 25 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010Policy DMD 45 of the Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD 47 of the Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD 48 of the Development Management Document 2014Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021Core Policy 30 of The Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010Policy DMD 8 of the Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD 37 of the Development Management Document 2014
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.