Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 May 20243329638

Eton Travel Agency, 104 - 105 High Street, Eton, Windsor, SL4 6AF

Planning appeal 3329638 at Eton Travel Agency, 104 - 105 High Street, Eton, Windsor, SL4 6AF (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 15 May 2024 by Inspector Cuthbert L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be permitted development under Class MA of the GPDO, with particular regard to whether the proposal would satisfy condition MA.2(2)(c) in regard to the flooding risks in relation to the building.

Prior approval to change the use of the first and second floor office accommodation (Class E) in the rear part of the building to 3no. dwellinghouses (Class C3)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Cuthbert L
Postcode
SL4 6AF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be permitted development under Class MA of the GPDO, with particular regard to whether the proposal would satisfy condition MA.2(2)(c) in regard to the flooding risks in relation to the building

What decided it

The pedestrian escape route from the site includes a significant 30m section categorised as 'danger for some' which fails to meet the requirement for a 'very low hazard' means of safe access and egress, and would not be safe for vulnerable occupants including the very old, very young and disabled.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NR1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 173

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

125 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed27 October 20266007126
    Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
  2. Allowed26 October 20266014376
    Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266009694
    Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266009005
    59 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
  5. Notice upheld24 September 20263353235
    Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.