Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20243329722

Weybridge Business Park, Addlestone Road, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 2UP

industrial redevelopment to provide 3 units within Classes E(g)ii (Research and development), E(g)iii (Industrial processes), B2 (General industrial) and B8 (storage and distribution) use, with ancillary office accommodation, new vehicular access, associated external yard areas, HGV and car parking, servicing, external lighting, hard and soft landscaping, infrastructure and all associated works following the demolition of existing buildings

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Wildsmith D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including on the setting of the Wey Navigation CA
  • its effect on the safety and convenience of users of the adjacent and nearby highway network, and on sustainable travel options in the area
  • its effect on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular reference to noise and disturbance from on-site operations and the likely comings and goings of large goods vehicles
  • whether any submitted planning obligations and/or planning conditions would adequately address the impacts of the proposed development

What decided it

The harmful impact of the proposed Unit 100 building on the character and appearance of the surrounding townscape, in conflict with LP Policy EE1, was not outweighed by the scheme's benefits.

Substantial weight to re-use of previously developed land and significant weight to economic benefits, together with moderate weight to sustainability/biodiversity benefits, were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance from Unit 100, meaning the proposal did not represent sustainable development and the appeal was dismissed.

Framework references: 8, 11, 55, 56, 57, 87, 114, 115, 124, 135, 180, 191

Plan policies cited: Policy EE1, Policy EE2, Policy EE3, Policy EE5, Policy EE9, Policy EE11, Policy SD3, Policy SD4, Policy SD5, Policy SD7, Policy SD8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.