Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20243329796

87A Walm Lane, London, NW2 4QL

Planning appeal 3329796 at 87A Walm Lane, London, NW2 4QL (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 18 June 2024 by Inspector Clark L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area.

the erection of a single storey extension to form 1 no. 1 person, 1-bedroom apartment, with associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Clark L
Postcode
NW2 4QL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for the occupants of 85A and Flat F 87 Walm Lane, with particular regard to a) outlook and b) natural light
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for all existing and future occupants of No 87, with particular reference to external amenity space

What decided it

The proposed development would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of current and future occupiers through loss of outlook, natural light and external amenity space, and would harm the character and appearance of the area, such that it conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 London Plan 2021Policy D4 London Plan 2021Policy D6 London PlanPolicy DMP1 Brent Local Plan 2019-2041Policy BD1 Brent Local Plan 2019-2041Policy BH4 Brent Local PlanPolicy BH13 Brent Local Plan

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 752 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011176
    7 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
  2. Allowed22 October 20266011738
    102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
  3. Allowed9 October 20266010212
    276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013509
    115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
  5. Allowed1 October 20266011602
    28A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.