Planning appeal decision
Site to the Rear of, Bantam Tea Rooms, High Street, Chipping Campden, GL55 6HB
Planning appeal 3329870 at Site to the Rear of, Bantam Tea Rooms, High Street, Chipping Campden, GL55 6HB (Cotswold District Council) was dismissed on 9 November 2023 by Inspector McEntee K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council failed to serve a Liability Notice under Regulation 117(1)(b) of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010.
- Authority
- Cotswold District Council
- Appeal type
- other · Community Infrastructure Levy Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- Not Applicable
- Inspector
- McEntee K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council failed to serve a Liability Notice under Regulation 117(1)(b) of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010
What decided it
The Liability Notice was properly served on the appellant and clearly explained the requirement to submit a Commencement Notice before commencing works, making the appellant liable for the surcharge upon commencement without submission.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cotswold
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 20266010613Land Rear of 88 Chesterton Lane, Cirencester, GL7 1YD
- Allowed13 October 20266007597Kilkeney Inn, Andoversford, Cheltenham, GL54 4LN
- Dismissed6 October 20266010770100 Gloucester Road, Cirencester, GL7 2LW
- Allowed30 September 20266009635Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
- Dismissed30 September 20266009631Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®