Planning appeal decision
Springwell Nursery & Garden Centre, Walden Road, Little Chesterford, Saffron Walden, CB10 1UE
Planning appeal 3329889 at Springwell Nursery & Garden Centre, Walden Road, Little Chesterford, Saffron Walden, CB10 1UE (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 21 August 2024 by Inspector Bowden N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site represents an appropriate location for housing, having particular regard to access to facilities and services.
Proposed residential development comprising 7 no detached dwellings, with associated works including demolition of existing nursery site and new access onto Walden Road
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bowden N
- Postcode
- CB10 1UE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site represents an appropriate location for housing, having particular regard to access to facilities and services
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the development on the setting of nearby listed buildings
- whether the development would result in the loss of an employment site and viability
- the effect of the development on flooding
- having considered all the above matters, whether the totality of the scheme and any other material considerations warrants a decision other than in accordance with the development plan
What decided it
The identified less than substantial harm to the setting of the three Grade II listed buildings, which engages paragraph 11(d) of the Framework and displaces the presumption in favour of development, combined with the harm to rural character and the unsustainable location, outweighs the modest benefits of housing delivery.
The less than substantial harm to the setting of the three Grade II listed buildings and harm to rural character and appearance, weighed against the modest social, economic and environmental benefits of seven open-market dwellings, tipped decisively against the proposal; the great weight given to heritage conservation was not outweighed by the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S7 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005Policy GEN1(e) of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005Policy GEN3 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005Policy ENV2 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005Policy RS3 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005Policy GLCNP/1 of the Great and Little Chesterford Neighbourhood PlanPolicy GLCNP/3 of the Great and Little Chesterford Neighbourhood PlanPolicy GLCNP/5 of the Great and Little Chesterford Neighbourhood PlanPolicy GLCNP/8 of the Great and Little Chesterford Neighbourhood Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 October 202660102676 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Dismissed13 October 20266009731Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
- Allowed6 October 20266006335Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
- Dismissed1 October 20266010951Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®