Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted7 May 20243329973

Springwood, 68A Blackburn Road, Whittle-Le-Woods, Chorley, PR6 8LH

a) the erection of one detached dwelling approved under 17/01124/FUL and 19/00445/FUL but not built in accordance with the approved plans. b) The property approved under 17/01124/FUL & 19/00445/FUL has not been built in accordance with the approved plans. c) Planning application 21/00896/FUL “Erection of one detached dwelling (retrospective)” was refused on 24/4/23

Authority
Chorley Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including an assessment of its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The fallback position (the extant 2019 permission plus realistic permitted development extensions) was found to cause more harm to Green Belt openness than the as-built dwelling, clearly outweighing the identified Green Belt harm.

The substantial weight attributed to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to the fallback position, so very special circumstances were found to exist.

Framework references: 152, 153, 154, 155, 54

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.