Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Kingston Close, Bury, BL8 2EJ
Planning appeal 3330029 at Land Adjacent to Kingston Close, Bury, BL8 2EJ (Bury Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 July 2024 by Inspector Moore J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal upon open space provision, highway safety, main water supply, and the character and appearance of the area.
erection of four dwellings and community facilities with associated parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Bury Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Moore J
- Postcode
- BL8 2EJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal upon open space provision, highway safety, main water supply, and the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with regard to relevant standards for internal space, and accessible and adaptable dwellings
- whether the proposed development would provide acceptable arrangements for the storage and collection of refuse and recycling
- whether the proposed development would provide acceptable arrangements for digital connectivity
- whether the proposed development would be net zero carbon
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to open space provision, highway safety, main water supply, and character and appearance, when weighed against the limited housing benefits, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the proposal under the Framework.
The adverse impacts of the proposal, comprising unacceptable harm to open space provision, highway safety, main water supply, and character and appearance, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of four dwellings and temporary economic benefits, when assessed against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DPD Policy JP-G6DPD Policy JP-P7DPD Policy JP-H3DPD Policy JP-C2DPD Policy JP-S2UDP Policy EN1/2UDP Policy H2/2UDP Policy H2/1UDP Policy HT2/4UDP Policy HT6/2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 103Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bury Metropolitan Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed7 July 20266007933Land Ar Rear of Westminster Avenue, Radcliffe, Manchester, M26 3WD
- Allowed11 April 20243330749Smith Fold Farm, Taylors Lane, Bury, Radcliffe, Bolton, BL2 6QS
- Allowed17 July 20233308871Land off Radcliffe Moor Road, Bury
- Dismissed6 January 202333076623 Dumers Lane, Bury, BL9 9PE
- Allowed22 July 2022328857541 Arthur Lane, Redcliffe, Bolton, BL2 5PR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®