Planning appeal decision
10 Sir Evelyn Road, Rochester , Kent , ME1 3NB
Planning appeal 3330069 at 10 Sir Evelyn Road, Rochester , Kent , ME1 3NB (Medway Council) was dismissed on 23 February 2024 by Inspector Grierson E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would constitute permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO.
a single storey brick extension, with a warm tiled pitched roof
- Authority
- Medway Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Grierson E
- Postcode
- ME1 3NB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would constitute permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO
What decided it
The proposed extension would fail to comply with paragraph A.1(j) of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO as it would extend beyond a side elevation wall of the original dwellinghouse with a width greater than half the width of the original dwelling.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Medway
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed26 October 20266014100130 High Street, Gillingham, ME7 1AS
- Dismissed9 October 20266009269Land Between Cumberland Road and Medway Road, Gillingham, ME7 1NH
- Dismissed2 October 20266009769Street Record, Callis Way, Parkwood, Gillingham, ME8 9PA
- Dismissed21 September 20266004691Land South of Woodview House, Perry Hill, Cliffe Woods, ME3 7TX
- Dismissed6 August 20266007660180-182 Luton Road, Chatham, ME4 5BP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®