Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20243330188

Manor Cottages, Common Lane,Ringinglow, Sheffield, S11 7TG

described on the application form as ‘extending roof over north side to form additional habitable rooms and alterations to the exterior. Additionally forming link roadway from existing driveway to south side

Authority
Sheffield City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host properties, including the significance of non-designated heritage assets
  • The effect on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of Ivy Cottage, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The proposal would cause harm to the character and appearance of the host properties and the significance of the non-designated heritage assets through an incongruous and unsympathetic roof extension that conflicts with the development plan and Framework, with no material considerations of sufficient weight to outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 209, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy BE5, Policy H14, Policy CS74, Guideline 1, Guideline 2, Guideline 6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.