Planning appeal decision
Rowley Hill Farm, Little Walden Road, Little Walden, Saffron Walden, CB10 1UZ
Planning appeal 3330332 at Rowley Hill Farm, Little Walden Road, Little Walden, Saffron Walden, CB10 1UZ (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 1 August 2024 by Inspector Bowden N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site represents an appropriate location for housing, having particular regard to access to facilities and services and loss of agricultural land.
the erection of up to 4 dwellings and associated work
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bowden N
- Postcode
- CB10 1UZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site represents an appropriate location for housing, having particular regard to access to facilities and services and loss of agricultural land
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether, in the event of harm being identified, material considerations indicate that the appeal should be determined otherwise than in accordance with the development plan
What decided it
The adverse impacts of the proposal—its unsustainable location remote from facilities and services, loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, and urbanising effect on rural character—significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate benefit of providing four new dwellings, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
The significant harm from conflict with development plan policies on location, agricultural land and rural character, given significant weight, outweighed the moderate benefit of four new dwellings, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S7Policy ENV5Policy GEN1(e)Policy SW12(1)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Braintree DC v SSCLG [2018] EWCA Civ. 610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 October 202660102676 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Dismissed13 October 20266009731Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
- Allowed6 October 20266006335Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
- Dismissed1 October 20266010951Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®