Planning appeal decision
Rose Farm, Stepshort, Belton, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 9JS
Planning appeal 3330450 at Rose Farm, Stepshort, Belton, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 9JS (Great Yarmouth Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 September 2024 by Inspector Norman R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to access to services and facilities.
to regularise the use of existing holiday accommodation as residential with year-round occupancy
- Authority
- Great Yarmouth Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Norman R
- Postcode
- NR31 9JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to access to services and facilities
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants
- the effect of the proposal on ecology and biodiversity
- whether the site should make a contribution to affordable housing, public open space and infrastructure in general
- the effect of the proposal on local employment and tourism
- the effect of the proposal on the landscape, Strategic Gap and the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the trees and hedges within and adjacent to the appeal site
- whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of access and highway safety
- the effects of the proposal on flood risk and surface water and foul drainage
- the effect of the proposal on climate change
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole, particularly through its location outside Development Limits and failure to provide acceptable living conditions, secure ecological mitigation, and contribute to required infrastructure, and these conflicts are not outweighed by the identified benefits given the Council's five-year housing land supply.
The benefits of a stable community, permanent surveillance, off-season economic benefits and housing choice were outweighed by the conflicts with the development plan regarding location outside Development Limits, living conditions, ecology, infrastructure contributions and loss of tourism, particularly given the Council's demonstrated five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GSP1Policy CS2Policy H5Policy H11Policy CS9Policy CS16Policy A2Policy CS11Policy CS4Policy UCS4Policy H2Policy CS14Policy GSP8Policy H4Policy CS6Policy CS7Policy CS8Policy GSP3Policy CS11 l)Policy E4Policy E6Policy CS1Policy CS13Policy E1Policy I3Policy I1Policy E7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 139
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Great Yarmouth
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 May 20253358397Land to the West of 5 Acres, Cherry Lane, Browston, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 9DN
- Dismissed16 January 20253342240Land to the South of Somerton Road and East of White Street, Martham, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk , NR29 4QF
- Dismissed18 September 202433435216 Trafalgar Road, Great Yarmouth, NR30 2LD
- Dismissed6 March 20243320442Breydon View, Market Road, Burgh Castle, Norfolk, NR31 9EN
- Dismissed7 February 20243327923The Warren, 19 Trafalgar Road, Great Yarmouth, NR30 2LD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®