Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 September 20243330450

Rose Farm, Stepshort, Belton, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR31 9JS

to regularise the use of existing holiday accommodation as residential with year-round occupancy

Authority
Great Yarmouth Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Norman R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to access to services and facilities
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants
  • the effect of the proposal on ecology and biodiversity
  • whether the site should make a contribution to affordable housing, public open space and infrastructure in general
  • the effect of the proposal on local employment and tourism
  • the effect of the proposal on the landscape, Strategic Gap and the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the trees and hedges within and adjacent to the appeal site
  • whether the proposal would be acceptable in terms of access and highway safety
  • the effects of the proposal on flood risk and surface water and foul drainage
  • the effect of the proposal on climate change

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole, particularly through its location outside Development Limits and failure to provide acceptable living conditions, secure ecological mitigation, and contribute to required infrastructure, and these conflicts are not outweighed by the identified benefits given the Council's five-year housing land supply.

The benefits of a stable community, permanent surveillance, off-season economic benefits and housing choice were outweighed by the conflicts with the development plan regarding location outside Development Limits, living conditions, ecology, infrastructure contributions and loss of tourism, particularly given the Council's demonstrated five-year housing land supply.

Framework references: 131, 135, 139

Plan policies cited: Policy GSP1, Policy CS2, Policy H5, Policy H11, Policy CS9, Policy CS16, Policy A2, Policy CS11, Policy CS4, Policy UCS4, Policy H2, Policy CS14, Policy GSP8, Policy H4, Policy CS6, Policy CS7, Policy CS8, Policy GSP3, Policy CS11 l), Policy E4, Policy E6, Policy CS1, Policy CS13, Policy E1, Policy I3, Policy I1, Policy E7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.