Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20243330911

Ground Floor Flat A, 66A Maple Avenue, Chingford, LONDON, E4 8RR

construction of a single storey front extension, raising height of existing building with installation of pitched roof and repositioning of front fence and entrance gate

Authority
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed development, with particular regard to internal space and outlook
  • whether the proposed development would accord with local and national planning policy regarding flood risk
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the area

What decided it

The proposal would result in unacceptably oppressive living conditions for future occupants of the second bedroom due to severely restricted outlook, combined with the failure to submit a required site-specific Flood Risk Assessment for development in Flood Zone 2.

Framework references: 135, 169, 173, 174

Plan policies cited: Policy 48, Policy 53, Policy 56, Policy 57, Policy 91

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.