®Planning appeal decision
Gloucester Lodge 12 Gloucester Gate and 12 & 13 Gloucester Gate Mews, London, NW1 4HG
Planning appeal 3331072 at Gloucester Lodge 12 Gloucester Gate and 12 & 13 Gloucester Gate Mews, London, NW1 4HG (London Borough of Camden) was allowed on 31 May 2024 by Inspector Tucker A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issues for all the appeals are the effect of the proposals upon the significance of the grade 1 listed building known as Gloucester Lodge (Number 12) Gloucester House (Number 14) and attached boundary wall, and whether they would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Regent's Park Conservation Area.
erection of glazed link connecting 12 Gloucester Gate and 12 and 13 Gloucester Gate Mews and associated works
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Tucker A
- Postcode
- NW1 4HG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issues for all the appeals are the effect of the proposals upon the significance of the grade 1 listed building known as Gloucester Lodge (Number 12) Gloucester House (Number 14) and attached boundary wall, and whether they would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Regent's Park Conservation Area.
What decided it
Whether each intervention caused harm to the significance of the listed building: none was found for the glazed link, whereas the relocation of historic fabric (door and staircase) caused less than substantial harm not outweighed by any public benefit.
For Appeals C and D, the less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance, of considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the proposal's benefits, which were found to be private rather than public; for Appeals A and B no harm was identified so no balancing exercise was required to determine the outcome.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D1Policy D2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Camden
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed13 October 20266013300166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
- Allowed12 October 20266007435Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
- Allowed12 October 20266007433Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
- Allowed12 October 20266007308Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
- Allowed12 October 20266007299Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.