Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed31 May 20243331072

Gloucester Lodge 12 Gloucester Gate and 12 & 13 Gloucester Gate Mews, London, NW1 4HG

erection of glazed link connecting 12 Gloucester Gate and 12 and 13 Gloucester Gate Mews and associated works

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Tucker A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issues for all the appeals are the effect of the proposals upon the significance of the grade 1 listed building known as Gloucester Lodge (Number 12) Gloucester House (Number 14) and attached boundary wall, and whether they would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Regent's Park Conservation Area.

What decided it

Whether each intervention caused harm to the significance of the listed building: none was found for the glazed link, whereas the relocation of historic fabric (door and staircase) caused less than substantial harm not outweighed by any public benefit.

For Appeals C and D, the less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance, of considerable importance and weight, was not outweighed by the proposal's benefits, which were found to be private rather than public; for Appeals A and B no harm was identified so no balancing exercise was required to determine the outcome.

Framework references: 205, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.