Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision19 February 20243331175

258 Plumstead Common Road, SE18 2RT

the construction of a single-storey side and rear wraparound extension, enlargement of first-floor side window, enlargement of first-floor rear window and reinstatement of original front porch

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cryan M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Plumstead Common Conservation Area
  • Living conditions for occupiers of the neighbouring property No 256 Plumstead Common Road, with particular regard to outlook and enclosure

What decided it

The proposed rear extension would cause less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset of the conservation area and unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions, which could not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.

Framework references: 195, 206, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy DH1, Policy DH3, Policy DH(h), Policy DH(a), Policy D3, Policy HC1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.