Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 August 20243331420

22 Castle Hill, Prestbury, MACCLESFIELD, SK10 4AS

a replacement dwelling with associated external works

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Ellis D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • Its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If it would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal would cause substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, and this harm is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify development do not exist.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy RUR13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.