Planning appeal decision
22 Castle Hill, Prestbury, MACCLESFIELD, SK10 4AS
a replacement dwelling with associated external works
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Ellis D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- Its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- If it would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The proposal would cause substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness, and this harm is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so the very special circumstances necessary to justify development do not exist.
Framework references: 154, 155
Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy RUR13
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®