Planning appeal decision
Land at Forsham House, Sutton Valence, Kent, ME17 3EW
Planning appeal 3331817 at Land at Forsham House, Sutton Valence, Kent, ME17 3EW (Maidstone Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 March 2024 by Inspector Miles H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to; the character and appearance of the area, the accessibility of the site by sustainable transport modes, and development plan policy.
Care village comprising an 87 bed care home and 12 assisted living apartments with doctors' consulting room, car parking, landscaping and associated development
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- community-institutional · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Miles H
- Postcode
- ME17 3EW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to; the character and appearance of the area, the accessibility of the site by sustainable transport modes, and development plan policy.
What decided it
The combined 'very significant' harm from unacceptable erosion of rural character, unsustainable reliance on the private car, and conflict with the development plan outweighed the significant benefits of providing housing for older and disabled people.
The significant benefit of housing for older and disabled people, together with moderate social/economic benefits and modest biodiversity net gain, did not outweigh the very significant harm to character and appearance, accessibility and development plan conflict.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SP17Policy DM14Policy DM1Policy DM30Policy LPRHOU7
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 October 2026601053621 Tasker Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, ME15 8NZ
- Allowed27 October 20266015190Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed27 October 20266011721Loxley House, Gravelly Bottom Road, Kingswood, Maidstone, ME17 3NT
- Allowed27 October 20266011076Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed26 October 20266010539Land Rear Of 58 Church Street, Boughton Monchelsea, Maidstone, ME17 4HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®